You've just reached 5,000 followers on Twitter. Congratulations. Now you have 5,000 people listening to you, right? Wrong! Let's take a closer look at about how many people you might be reaching with each message.
Information is processed hierarchically, following the six steps of McGuire's Information Processing Paradigm. The tweet must first be presented to the core audience, they must be attentive to it, understand what is presented, and yield to the statement; they must retain that information and then choose to act upon it at that point. To break it down into basic steps:
1. Attention- Once a message is presented, the recipient must pay attention to it in order for it to produce attitude change.
2. Comprehension - position recommended by the communicator must be comprehended.
3. Acceptance - must yield to the message content if any attitude change is to be detectable.
4. Retention - If change is to persist, must retain changed attitude over time.
5. Action - recipient must behave on the basis of the current or changed attitude.
The important point here is that the process is hierarchical, involving compounding probabilities. This means each step in processing information is dependent upon the successful completion of the previous step, and the percentage of the target audience positively responding at each step is multiplied over the six steps.
For example:
If 60% of the Twitter audience is exposed to a message and 45% pay attention, that means only 27% of the target audience is even available for comprehension; and so on through the last step - acting upon the message.
Once exposed to the tweet, the tweet must be processed, and successful processing involves:
- Attention
- Learning
- Acceptance
- Emotion
Conscious attention is required in order to fully process the tweet. One may not necessarily be aware of the tweet at first, but neurologically it must activate conscious processing in working memory, which will then lead to activity.
Conclusion
This full assessment is assuming they are following the general stream. This does not include segmentation features that such tools as TweetDeck provides that allows people to group certain people together and only follow their messaging. I believe Twitter really needs to work on it's social, search, and segmentation features to keep people feeling like they are being listened to and not feel like they are being drowned out by a large pool of noise.
Good point 🙂
I have often wondered how many Tweets I miss because I am not CONSTANTLY in front of my MAC, checking who wrote what. Consequently, most of my followers will miss my Tweets.
So until Twitter comes to the table on this one, anyone got a solution?
This is the age old argument of rather than concentrating on numbers, concentrate on interacting with people in your feed and make sure they are ‘on topic’.
I try my best to do both (I follow everyone back, ish), but when looking for people to follow I only search by location or niche.
Hope this helps…
.-= @stuartflatt recently posted: stuartflatt: @peterdean1 Thanks Peter, I found a couple of reasonable articles on Mashable but they were a bit dated. These look good. Hope you are well. =-.
It doesn’t matter how many people follow you but how many people interact with you matters.
.-= Granite Countertop recently posted: Other Natural Stone Products =-.
Well it’s the same old story really. I’d rather have 200 converting visitors/followers than 100,000 and only 10 that convert. As always, it’s quality over quantity.
I do agree that Twitter really needs to work on it’s social, search, and segmentation features to keep people feeling like they are being listened to. I hope more tools are introduced to help with the Twitter experience.
We have reached 16,000 followers which has giving us a broad following to reach, but spending a lot more time trying to manage the relationships.
I agree with the other readers that quality over quantity and conversion does matter.
Thanks for shedding light on the subject with a great Blog.
http://www.twitter.com/seonow